On Jun 6, 7:37 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, admittedly stupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge: On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:17:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, admittedly stupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge: On Wed, 04 Jun 2008,
On May 12, 10:26 pm, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote: On May 11, 9:44 am, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato (snip to the crash) What if there were a different mathematics which was somehow disjoint or disconnected from teh present model ? If all the rules were consistent - would it not also be science ? First, mathematics is not a science in that there is no
In article <0086bd51-1d18-4fdb-9490-7a3d565a2841@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, george <greeneg@cs.unc.edu> wrote: On May 8, 7:18 pm, "Scott H" <nospam> wrote: Definitions: Let T be a theory strong enough to support arithmetic. Let T' be a theory with the same axioms as T formulated within T. This is incoherent. THE ONLY theory with the same axioms as T over the same signature
"Rudy Canoza" <pipes@thedismalscience.noot> wrote in message news:bcGdncqKxsoqrLzVnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@earthlink.com... Rupert wrote: On May 6, 8:46 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote: Rupert wrote: On May 6, 3:26 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.not> wrote: Rupert wrote: On May 6, 11:28 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.not> wrote:
Rupert wrote: On Apr 14, 4:51 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.not> wrote: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, THE GOOBER, a colossally stupid fuckwit and a stupid credulous Southern Baptist shitworm - lied and presented no challenge: On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Rudy Canoza humiliated GooFuckwit *again*: Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, THE GOOBER, a colossally stupid fuckwit
