On 2008-06-20, in <e819558a-3503-4615-9744-23c1b2ce2569@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.co AnonymousNasty <swat2personal@hotmail.com> wrote: From The TimesJune 20, 2008 http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/the_way_we_live/article4173635.ece [I formatted this like a usenet article so that it would be easy to see what's the original article and what's my response. It's
On 2008-06-19, in <svhl54pp5qhqg7kjatr1gt4jn2ibk5egsf@4ax.com> henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote: http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/ women/the_way_we_live/article4173635.ece [I formatted this like a usenet article so that it would be easy to see what's the original article and what's my response.] Scientology: the Anonymous protestors The Church of Scientology
Great article, but of course it doesn't count for anything, since it was not included in Monica's recent Lexis-Nexis search compilation, and they're just a bunch of masked little troublemaking brats anyway, However, I do think the London Times qualifies as a major publication, doesn't it? On Jun 19, 10:57 pm, henri <he...@nowhere.com> wrote: http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_
On Mar 25, 8:16 pm, "RichL" <rpleav...@yahoo.com> commented: It doesn't matter to me, and I suspect to most people, how much other music a particular poster is familiar with. Not to put a damper on what is otherwise a fantastic comment, Rich, but I would suggest that it matters to some here on RMB that posters have a familiarity with Beatles music. : ) As I said before, most of us
