nospam@sbcglobal.invalid.net wrote: Here in the U.S., outside of gyms I rarely see very fit adults. The general public ranges from pudgy to fat. Depends upon where you live. Today I was at Pier 39, Fisherman's Wharf, and noticed that the few tourists speaking English were the only people who were fat. All other languages came from non-fat bodies. We San Franciscans are among the least
My favorite part was " ... Yet if family environment alone has no role in obesity, ... " In other words, one's daily environment, in which he/she chooses the types and quantity of food to eat throughout the day, and his/her activity level, has no role in obesity. This will come as a big surprise to the believers (like me) in calories in vs. calories burned -> fat gain/loss. And a delight
On May 9, 8:25 pm, doug lerner <dougler...@gmail.com> wrote: I'm sure many of you have seen this New York Times article already. I find it both fascinating and, to be honest, somewhat discouraging. Particularly the part about metabolism changes. doug ----- May 8, 2007 Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside By GINA KOLATA It was 1959. Jules Hirsch, a
I'm sure many of you have seen this New York Times article already. I find it both fascinating and, to be honest, somewhat discouraging. Particularly the part about metabolism changes. doug ----- May 8, 2007 Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside By GINA KOLATA It was 1959. Jules Hirsch, a research physician at Rockefeller University, had gotten curious about weight loss
aegis wrote: trader4@optonline.net wrote: aegis wrote: trader4@optonline.net wrote: I care only in the regard that someone may fall under the same terrible delusions as yourself. Don't conflate this with caring about the confused way you are following this thread. What terrible delusions would those be? That Americans are
