Received: from [91.76.35.229] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 05:06:56 -0500 Return-Path: <jr@mojoblue.us> Received: from 76.162.254.4 (HELO mail4.hostexcellence.com) by openbrick.kicks-ass.net with esmtp (GPZATQXDVG ERVWNP) id CgGSiL-30AMJK-GY for [removed]; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:06:54 +0300 Message

*** Obviously, Perino is off-base with this response, possibly didn't clear it with any higher ups. A lie, at best. A Bushism. But believing that any journalist would buy this crap is beyond credulity. However, after observing her in the job as press secretary, I feel she's way over her head. Oh, she's a sweet piece, what my boyfriend calls "eatin' material." But I think she's merely

On Mar 8, 3:20 pm, Craig Fink <WeBeG...@GMail.Com> wrote: Hi Len, Well were not in agreement here. To say that we've studied many concepts and none of them worked, therefore no concept will work, is fallacious. I generally never say never. However, studying a lot of concepts does shed light on what appear to be basic principles. In light of these prinicples, I have to downgrade

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:56:30 -0800, PolishKnight wrote: pandora wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:04:39 -0800, Hyerdahl wrote: PolishKnight wrote: Sometimes it's best to put the conclusion before the post: :-) Are you suggesting women don't want to vote, own property, control their own bodies, work for equal pay, etc. This is a nice close

pandora wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:08:43 -0800, Hyerdahl wrote: pandora wrote: (edit) Well, it seems that Mark chased after all those things he said he didn't want; he puts down men for marrying American women and American women for being wives, and went all the way to Russia to buy one. I mean....he ended up with an American wife. :-) Patriarchy