Attracs
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 178 articles for 0.303 sec
An accompanying mail was sent to the following addresses which are thought to be responsible for domain(s), IP blocks, ASN, or nameservers associated with the origin point: abuse@constantcontact.com, postmaster@constantcontact.com Message abstract: Message ID: <1102228181624.1102181628759.14838.8.20160507@scheduler> Originating IP address: 63.251.135.75 (ccm00.constantcontact     

Group: news.admin.netabuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in news.admin.netabuse.sightings
Author: Chris
Date: Sep 10, 2008 17:52

Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> writes: Haines Brown <brownh@teufel.hartford-hwp.com> writes: Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> writes: We are talking at cross purposes. I don't believe biologists work from the theories or axioms specific to physics, but only the biological level is constrained by the physical. Physics includes basic measurement, such as the measuring
Show full article (29.99Kb)
Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> writes: > Haines Brown <brownh@teufel.hartford-hwp.com> writes: >>Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> writes: > >>> But "shared meaning" isn't anything like solid ground. It's rather >>> ethereal, poorly exlained, and perhaps doesn't exist (i.e. part of a >>> poor explanation). > >>Why "ethereal" in relation to solid ground. > > That was in contrast     

Group: sci.philosophy.meta · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in sci.philosophy.meta
Author: Haines Brown
Date: Jul 28, 2008 05:28

Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> writes: Haines Brown <brownh@teufel.hartford-hwp.com> writes: Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> writes: My use of the word foundational may not be the same as your word "based". By foundational I do not mean to imply that the content of the science can be reduced to it, but that it operates as a constraint on what is possible in that
Show full article (8.91Kb) · Show article thread
On 17 Jul., 23:30, Surfer <n...@spam.net> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:21:35 -0700 (PDT), Rudolf Drabek > > <newsr...@aon.at> wrote: > >http://www3.telus.net/foamyether > > >I find this very attractive, because ether is needed, which was > >eliminated by Einsteins findings. > >But he never said that there is no ether. > > >So photons are a distortion in ether and no real particle with     

Group: sci.philosophy.meta · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in sci.philosophy.meta
Author: Haines Brown
Date: Jul 26, 2008 19:02

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:21:35 -0700 (PDT), Rudolf Drabek <newsrudy@aon.at> wrote: http://www3.telus.net/foamyether I find this very attractive, because ether is needed, which was eliminated by Einsteins findings. But he never said that there is no ether. So photons are a distortion in ether and no real particle with mass ( acc. new measurements?) is needed. May be it's attracive
Show full article (8.21Kb) · Show article thread
On Jul 17, 6:21 am, Rudolf Drabek <newsr...@aon.at> wrote: > http://www3.telus.net/foamyether > > I find this very attractive, because ether is needed, which was > eliminated by Einsteins findings. > But he never said that there is no ether. > > So photons are a distortion in ether and no real particle with mass > ( acc. new measurements?) > is needed. > May be it's attracive only for me     

Group: sci.philosophy.meta · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in sci.philosophy.meta
Author: Haines Brown
Date: Jul 25, 2008 12:56

On Jun 6, 10:36 am, NewMan <CloakedRun2...@yahoo.ca> wrote: On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:05:42 -0700 (PDT), Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jun 6, 6:18 am, NewMan <CloakedRun2...@yahoo.ca> wrote: On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:02:23 -0700 (PDT), Vickie <lilliputianbizz...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jun 5, 11:32 pm, mom0f4boys <momsh...@msn.com> wrote:
Show full article (9.11Kb) · Show article thread
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:05:42 -0700 (PDT), Vickie <lilliputianbizzare@gmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 6, 6:18 am, NewMan <CloakedRun2...@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:02:23 -0700 (PDT), Vickie >> >> >> >> >> >> <lilliputianbizz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Jun 5, 11:32 pm, mom0f4boys <momsh...@msn.com> wrote: >> >>      I try so hard to make this marriage equal, to see my husband as     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Rudolf Drabek
Date: Jul 18, 2008 06:23

Show full article (2.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Surfer
Date: Jul 17, 2008 14:30

Show full article (2.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Sue...
Date: Jul 17, 2008 04:52

Show full article (0.97Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Rudolf Drabek
Date: Jul 17, 2008 03:21

Show full article (0.34Kb)
    

Group: alt.support.marriage · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in alt.support.marriage
Author: Vickie
Date: Jun 6, 2008 10:56

Show full article (4.44Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.support.marriage · Group Profile · Search for Attracs in alt.support.marriage
Author: NewMan
Date: Jun 6, 2008 10:36

Show full article (4.17Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next