... as a physical object. I know when I'm "prime moving"- as Aristotle said, "awake, thinking, and conscious." But that is a different grammar, and therefore, a different interpretation by Aristotlian logic. He did not do 'consciousness' philosophy. d] I agree with you about no public truth conditions for 'consciousness'. It's a requirement for philosophy as well. "No public truth conditions...

... give way and reshape in order to be sharpened? I have seen no variance from you yet. You so far still stick to your first premise despite lack of support for it. You rely on aristotlian material causality - yet that principle does not (could not) account for quantum fluctuations. You need to address that to really show any 'sharpening'. In fact some players have lost so badly I don'...

..." and "'systematic study'" are synonyms? How odd, none of these dictionaries mention process either. Then you show your ignorance of words as well as of science. Whatever you think. Aristotlian physics was replaced by Newton It was? Do you mean the method of science formulated by Aristotle in the 4th century B.C.? No I mean 'Aristotelian physics', the ...

... a methodology. the 'systematic study' that is in the words above. How odd, none of these dictionaries mention process either. Then you show your ignorance of words as well as of science. Aristotlian physics was replaced by Newton It was? Do you mean the method of science formulated by Aristotle in the 4th century B.C.? No I mean 'Aristotelian physics', the description ...

... principles you and your atheist fellow travelers hold as immutable truth. Actually you show your ignorence about science. Science is not a subject, or a series of facts, it is a _process_. Aristotlian physics was replaced by Newton and this changed by Einstein. Each is just a step along the way. Science is _not_ about immutable truth, we leave that to the religionists who seem to be ...