And here s my wedding picture
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 42231 articles for 0.996 sec
> On Aug 15, 9:44 am, "Mr. Strat" <r...@nospam.techline.com> wrote: >> In article <60473ffe6501d5d2571bbfcb255ab...@pseudo.borked.net>, Borked >> >> Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net> wrote: >>> I have a question I hope you can help me with. I was looking at a >>> webpage of wedding pictures and the photographer used an ISO setting >>> of 800 and up with and without flash. All the     

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: The Royal Spam
Date: Aug 16, 2008 14:22

On Aug 15, 9:44 am, "Mr. Strat" <r...@nospam.techline.com> wrote: In article <60473ffe6501d5d2571bbfcb255ab...@pseudo.borked.net>, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net> wrote: I have a question I hope you can help me with. I was looking at a webpage of wedding pictures and the photographer used an ISO setting of 800 and up with and without flash. All the pictures were
Show full article (0.92Kb) · Show article thread
In article <60473ffe6501d5d2571bbfcb255aba28@pseudo.borked.net>, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote: > I have a question I hope you can help me with. I was looking at a > webpage of wedding pictures and the photographer used an ISO setting > of 800 and up with and without flash. All the pictures were taken > inside the church and were beautiful. > > My understanding     

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Scott W
Date: Aug 15, 2008 15:24

On Aug 11, 9:00 am, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net> wrote: Hello Everyone, I have a question I hope you can help me with. I was looking at a webpage of wedding pictures and the photographer used an ISO setting of 800 and up with and without flash. All the pictures were taken inside the church and were beautiful. My understanding was the higher the ISO the more
Show full article (0.74Kb) · Show article thread
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in news:60473ffe6501d5d2571bbfcb255aba28@pseudo.borked.net: > Hello Everyone, > > I have a question I hope you can help me with. I was looking at a > webpage of wedding pictures and the photographer used an ISO setting > of 800 and up with and without flash. All the pictures were taken > inside the church and were beautiful. >     

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Mr. Strat
Date: Aug 15, 2008 12:44

Hello Everyone, I have a question I hope you can help me with. I was looking at a webpage of wedding pictures and the photographer used an ISO setting of 800 and up with and without flash. All the pictures were taken inside the church and were beautiful. My understanding was the higher the ISO the more noise in the picture. What am I missing here, everytime I use an ISO of 800 and up
Show full article (0.59Kb) · Show article thread
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:59:22 GMT, "DanR" <dhr22@sorrynospam.com> wrote: : I'm wondering why a pro photographer would do this? : My daughters wedding pictures were delivered to her on CD. I notice that all : of them have a 600x480 or 480x600 aspect ratio. They are much larger but : using 480 as a common denominator and comparing these pictures to other : camera pictures I see that my Canon XTi     

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Vance
Date: Aug 11, 2008 22:39

Yes, a 480 p x 600 p ratio is the same ratio as 4" x 5" or 8" x 10 inches - standard image size. 4 x 6 is 35mm aspect ratio, but frame sizes are generally 4x5, 5x7, 8x10, etc. -- The smaller the fine print, the less you will like what it says. Stan Beck From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. *** "DanR" <dhr22@sorrynospam.com> wrote in message news
Show full article (2.04Kb) · Show article thread
As far as I know the deal was sort of a buy-out. No prints were delivered. Only the CD to do with whatever. You mention standard frame size. So I assume you mean that she could have prints made that will fit nicely in off the shelf frames without trimming the image. "Stan Beck" <stan101@neworleansphotographs.com> wrote in message news:0LSdnf9Qw5RnAD7bnZ2dnUVZ_saknZ2d@comcast.com... >     

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Matti Vuori
Date: Aug 11, 2008 12:55

How does that ratio relate to standard frame sizes? It is also a good size for the computer screen, but won't allow you to go buy prints of his photos from somebody else. -- The smaller the fine print, the less you will like what it says. Stan Beck From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. *** "DanR" <dhr22@sorrynospam.com> wrote in message news:_VMoi
Show full article (0.91Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Borked Pseudo Mailed
Date: Aug 11, 2008 09:00

Show full article (0.44Kb)
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Robert Coe
Date: Jul 22, 2007 17:24

Show full article (1.69Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Stan Beck
Date: Jul 22, 2007 12:09

Show full article (2.17Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: DanR
Date: Jul 22, 2007 11:20

Show full article (1.68Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.photography · Group Profile · Search for And here s my wedding picture in alt.photography
Author: Stan Beck
Date: Jul 22, 2007 11:12

Show full article (1.25Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next