...Speed wrote: stan <smoore@exis.net> wrote I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. ... any better. Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag. If you need ...googling for some slightly more mature insults I'm sure someone at school can help you if there any that will...

...@exis.net> wrote Rod Speed wrote: stan <smoore@exis.net> wrote I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. More fool you. How would .... I couldn't have proved the point any better. Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

Rod Speed wrote: stan <smoore@exis.net> wrote I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. More fool you. How would you know? The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply never fails. Mindlessly silly. I couldn't have proved the point any better.

... more, anyone who is posting to a tech group but isn't really interested in technology is irrational *per se.* I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply never fails. ...

... more, anyone who is posting to a tech group but isn't really interested in technology is irrational *per se.* I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply never fails. On ...

... more, anyone who is posting to a tech group but isn't really interested in technology is irrational *per se.* I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. More fool you. The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply...

> I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply never fails. As qualified for casino. No 30 dollar casino warriors. There is a level of playing field for 1000 dollar reqirements. I figure you people out how you think. There ...

> I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply never fails. As qualified for casino. No 30 dollar casino warriors. There is a level of playing field for 1000 dollar reqirements. I figure you people out how you think. There is a metric. You people are in a casino.

...Even more, anyone who is posting to a tech group but isn't really interested in technology is irrational *per se.* I think the easiest way to identify someone posing as qualified is to check the number of crossposted groups. The more groups the more confusion; the metric simply never fails.

Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind stan <smoore@exis.net> desperately attempted to bullshit its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.