... seed) DEALLOCATE(seed) END SUBROUTINE I simply don't understand this syntax. I'm keen on parts of it. 37 is a sexy prime, one of my uncle Charles', algebraist, top ten numbers. Indeed, the highest one. In the old days, the internal state was usually one machine word. Many now have a much larger internal state, sometimes 256 bits or more. CALL ...
...+ 37 * (/ (i - 1, i = 1, n) /) CALL RANDOM_SEED(PUT = seed) DEALLOCATE(seed) END SUBROUTINE I simply don't understand this syntax. I'm keen on parts of it. 37 is a sexy prime, one of my uncle Charles', algebraist, top ten numbers. Indeed, the highest one. I don't know what's being allocated here: ALLOCATE(seed(n)) ?? -- Howard
... could also start talking about the Axiom of Choice here. But an algebra based on that operator would be very helpful I think. Unfortuately, nobody has ever invented such a thing and I am no algebraist. But I can give it a whirl and see what happens...just for the hell of it. Havent made much headway on that thus far....except for the geometric justification which does seem to give a ...
... does not match the reals of any representation ever used in digital computers. It isn't really a matter of opinion, but of mathematical definition. If your notion of real numbers is different from that of "standard" mathematics, then that's a different matter. Algebraists agreed not to fight about it at the beginning of the twentieth century and leave it to the analysts.
... does not match the reals of any representation ever used in digital computers. It isn't really a matter of opinion, but of mathematical definition. If your notion of real numbers is different from that of "standard" mathematics, then that's a different matter. Algebraists agreed not to fight about it at the beginning of the twentieth century and leave it to the analysts. -- LS
... not numbers, said the old rationalists. (When they are not fractions, then.. )They exists only in the relation of incommensurable quantities. The imaginaries are not numbers, said the early algebraists. They are locations at an right angle to a principle direction. And where is their mathematics now? It was either absorbed and surpassed by the newer methods, or discarded when ...
... the abacists. The fractions and the negatives are not numbers, said the early arithmeticians. The reals are not numbers, said the old rationalists. The imaginaries are not numbers, said the early algebraists. And where is their mathematics now? It was either absorbed and surpassed by the newer methods, or discarded when it conflicted with them. Thus it has been, and thus it shall be ...
...REF" type that was essentially and OID.] +--------------- | Would you say the relational algebra has references? +--------------- Don't confuse "SQL" & "relational algebra"!! You'll get real relational algebraists *way* bent out of shape if you do that! +--------------- | (Some SQL dialects also offer synthetic "ID" fields that are | guaranteed to remain stable over the lifetime...
