Alebeit
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 5 articles for 0.303 sec
On Apr 17, 5:28 pm, "Leon" <wordswo...@att.net> wrote: > "maxine in ri" <weed...@gmail.com> wrote .. > > > On Apr 15, 7:23 pm, rdad...@panix.com (Dick Adams) wrote: > >> Harry Farkas <hfar...@wowway.com> wrote: > >> > So do blondes have more frum? > > >> Did you ever meet a pious orthodox blond? > > >> Dick > > > Does a blond shaytel count? > > > maxine in ri > > The "Five Towns" on     

Group: rec.humor.jewish · Group Profile · Search for Alebeit in rec.humor.jewish
Author: maxine in ri
Date: Apr 21, 2008 20:06

zookumar yelubandi wrote: Vandar wrote: zookumar yelubandi wrote: [...] Conjecture. Again, if we assume that the FDR data is real, then it reveals the jetliner was at too high an altitude to crash into the Pentagon, and it reveals the flight path is different from the one required to intercept the positioning of the "knocked down" light poles.
Show full article (1.20Kb) · Show article thread
zookumar yelubandi wrote: > Vandar wrote: > >>zookumar yelubandi wrote: > > [...] > >>> Conjecture. Again, if we assume that the FDR data is real, then >>>it reveals the jetliner was at too high an altitude to crash into the >>>Pentagon, and it reveals the flight path is different from the one >>>required to intercept the positioning of the "knocked down" light poles. >>     

Group: sci.skeptic · Group Profile · Search for Alebeit in sci.skeptic
Author: Vandar
Date: Jun 24, 2007 01:40

Vandar wrote: zookumar yelubandi wrote: [...] Conjecture. Again, if we assume that the FDR data is real, then it reveals the jetliner was at too high an altitude to crash into the Pentagon, and it reveals the flight path is different from the one required to intercept the positioning of the "knocked down" light poles. That's if you assume the interpretation of the
Show full article (16.48Kb)
Vandar wrote: > zookumar yelubandi wrote: [...] > > Conjecture. Again, if we assume that the FDR data is real, then > > it reveals the jetliner was at too high an altitude to crash into the > > Pentagon, and it reveals the flight path is different from the one > > required to intercept the positioning of the "knocked down" light poles. > That's if you assume the interpretation of the     

Group: alt.conspiracy · Group Profile · Search for Alebeit in alt.conspiracy
Author: Vandar
Date: Jun 24, 2007 01:40

Show full article (16.48Kb)
    

Group: sci.skeptic · Group Profile · Search for Alebeit in sci.skeptic
Author: zookumar yelubandi
Date: Jun 23, 2007 19:43

Show full article (12.39Kb)
    

Group: alt.conspiracy · Group Profile · Search for Alebeit in alt.conspiracy
Author: zookumar yelubandi
Date: Jun 23, 2007 19:43

Show full article (12.39Kb)