...(0.0e0)) :: a is suitable for different computers. But why in C++ the same format can use in different computers? And in Fotran, why we can't use real(4) and real(8)? 2. Are there any advatages of Fortran with real(kind = kind(0.0e0)) and real(kind = kind(0.0d0)) than C++? The key to the answers is that the form real(4) etc. is non-standard and can have ...

...0.0e0)) :: a is suitable for different computers. But why in C++ the same format can use in different computers? And in Fotran, why we can't use real(4) and real(8)? 2. Are there any advatages of Fortran with real(kind = kind(0.0e0)) and real(kind = kind(0.0d0)) than C++? The key to the answers is that the form real(4) etc. is non-standard and can have different ...

....0e0)) :: a is suitable for different computers. But why in C++ the same format can use in different computers? And in Fotran, why we can't use real(4) and real(8)? 2. Are there any advatages of Fortran with real(kind = kind(0.0e0)) and real(kind = kind(0.0d0)) than C++? The key to the answers is that the form real(4) etc. is non-standard and can have different meanings (or...

... a is suitable for different computers. But why in C++ the same format can use in different computers? And in Fotran, why we can't use real(4) and real(8)? 2. Are there any advatages of Fortran with real(kind = kind(0.0e0)) and real(kind = kind(0.0d0)) than C++? In Fortran you do this: INTEGER, PARAMETER :: Single = SELECTED_REAL_KIND(6) ! Single precision INTEGER, ...

...Is there different between Fortran and C++? The answer is Yes in some cases. 1. I saw somewhere real(kind = kind(0.0e0)) :: a is suitable for different computers. But why in C++ the same format can use in different computers? And in Fotran, why we can't use real(4) and real(8)? 2. Are there any advatages of Fortran with real(kind = kind(0.0e0)) and real(kind = kind(0.0d0)) than C++?

...) looks pretty damn bare compared to what it used to, but super fast loading :P (originally I did this because doubleshits were broken and not letting australianIT load past the blank blue top banner, so it has a double advatage now hehe) -- Cheers Res update auth set Framed-IP-Address='127.0.0.127' where user= 'troll'; ~# radzap troll

.... I believe I saw at least one f95 compiler that implements move_alloc now, but you can't yet portably count on that. Alternatively, in f2003, you can do it all in one line, taking advatage of the realloc on assignment, with something like systems = [ systems, (filler, i = 1, n_elements_to_add) ] where filler is a scalar value of the right type. You could probably use systems(1) for ...

... you wanted to play...we can go back to being civil if you'd like. Civil? Here? Talk football maybe? The Tampa Two that Chicago employs has been taken advatage of this season over the middle. Kinda sorta scares me at times. I saw what Hasslebeck did to the Gints last week. The Bears have been applying good pressure with just their front four. ...

... the dozens, but you wanted to play...we can go back to being civil if you'd like. Civil? Here? Talk football maybe? The Tampa Two that Chicago employs has been taken advatage of this season over the middle. Kinda sorta scares me at times. I saw what Hasslebeck did to the Gints last week. The Bears have been applying good pressure with just their front four. That's ...

..., I don't do the dozens, but you wanted to play...we can go back to being civil if you'd like. Civil? Here? Talk football maybe? The Tampa Two that Chicago employs has been taken advatage of this season over the middle. Kinda sorta scares me at times. I saw what Hasslebeck did to the Gints last week. The Bears have been applying good pressure with just their front four. That's the key...