Acestral
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 11 articles for 0.242 sec
Just read Giladi's article: http://www.bintjbeil.com/E/occupation/ameu_iraqjews.html You will find that most of your beliefs about Israel are lies. He even put the lie to your claims that Israel has offered peace. Shlomo wrote: > On Sep 22, 1:40 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: > >>Shlomo wrote: > > > >>>The attack on Egypt was not "unprovoked"; rather, it was in response     

Group: us.politics · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in us.politics
Author: Bill Rood
Date: Sep 23, 2007 00:10

Just read Giladi's article: http://www.bintjbeil.com/E/occupation/ameu_iraqjews.html You will find that most of your beliefs about Israel are lies. He even put the lie to your claims that Israel has offered peace. Shlomo wrote: On Sep 22, 1:40 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: Shlomo wrote: The attack on Egypt was not "unprovoked"; rather, it was in response
Show full article (18.24Kb) · Show article thread
Just read Giladi's article: http://www.bintjbeil.com/E/occupation/ameu_iraqjews.html You will find that most of your beliefs about Israel are lies. He even put the lie to your claims that Israel has offered peace. Shlomo wrote: > On Sep 22, 1:40 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: > >>Shlomo wrote: > > > >>>The attack on Egypt was not "unprovoked"; rather, it was in response     

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in alt.politics.usa
Author: Bill Rood
Date: Sep 23, 2007 00:10

On Sep 22, 1:40 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: Shlomo wrote: The attack on Egypt was not "unprovoked"; rather, it was in response to escalating Acts of War against Israel by Egypt. Bull. I read the papers at the time. Nasser was backing off and had publicly stated that he had achieved all his goals. At the time, I remember nothing of what you say here. What
Show full article (18.24Kb) · Show article thread
On Sep 22, 1:40 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: > Shlomo wrote: > > The attack on Egypt was not "unprovoked"; rather, it was in response > > to escalating Acts of War against Israel by Egypt. > > Bull. I read the papers at the time. Nasser was backing off and had > publicly stated that he had achieved all his goals. At the time, I remember nothing of what you say here. What     

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in talk.politics.mideast
Author: Bill Rood
Date: Sep 23, 2007 00:10

On Sep 22, 1:40 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: Shlomo wrote: The attack on Egypt was not "unprovoked"; rather, it was in response to escalating Acts of War against Israel by Egypt. Bull. I read the papers at the time. Nasser was backing off and had publicly stated that he had achieved all his goals. At the time, I remember nothing of what you say here. What
Show full article (18.24Kb) · Show article thread
Shlomo wrote: > On Sep 21, 3:01 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: > >>Shlomo wrote: > > > >>>Considering that the Arabs were on the losing side of 2 wars with >>>Israel >>>(War of Independence and the Six Day War), they were getting a good >>>deal. >> >>>Don't for one second lose sight of the fact that the only reason >>>Israel got control of the West Bank was in response     

Group: us.politics · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in us.politics
Author: Shlomo
Date: Sep 22, 2007 04:50

Shlomo wrote: On Sep 21, 3:01 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: Shlomo wrote: Considering that the Arabs were on the losing side of 2 wars with Israel (War of Independence and the Six Day War), they were getting a good deal. Don't for one second lose sight of the fact that the only reason Israel got control of the West Bank was in response
Show full article (9.35Kb) · Show article thread
Shlomo wrote: > On Sep 21, 3:01 am, Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote: > >>Shlomo wrote: > > > >>>Considering that the Arabs were on the losing side of 2 wars with >>>Israel >>>(War of Independence and the Six Day War), they were getting a good >>>deal. >> >>>Don't for one second lose sight of the fact that the only reason >>>Israel got control of the West Bank was in response     

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in alt.politics.usa
Author: Shlomo
Date: Sep 22, 2007 04:50

On May 6, 12:36 pm, Deborah <debo...@noemail.com> wrote: On 6 May 2007 07:45:35 -0700, Thunderbird <donmar...@shaw.ca> wrote: (Most of my ancestry is Irish, a race which tends to be both contrary and mischievous....so you might be forgiven if you think my mea cupla is not entirely sincere.) ;-) So is mine, actually. Goes way back to that Irish migration to Scotland 400+
Show full article (9.35Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in talk.politics.mideast
Author: Shlomo
Date: Sep 22, 2007 04:50

Show full article (9.35Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: us.politics · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in us.politics
Author: Bill Rood
Date: Sep 21, 2007 22:40

Show full article (9.91Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in alt.politics.usa
Author: Bill Rood
Date: Sep 21, 2007 22:40

Show full article (9.91Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.mideast · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in talk.politics.mideast
Author: Bill Rood
Date: Sep 21, 2007 22:40

Show full article (9.91Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: can.politics · Group Profile · Search for Acestral in can.politics
Author: Thunderbird
Date: May 6, 2007 17:42

Show full article (3.00Kb)
1 · 2 · next