knucmo <stevejouanny@hotmail.com> wrote in news:ff575952-c519-4d2c-9d7c-5521075e47b3@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com: I'd be interested to hear what you think of the concept of class Publius... Pretty broad topic. Can you narrow it down? In relation to the organic fallacy - do you think the idea of 'class' attaches to individuals? "Social classes" are arbitrary ...

On 14 Sep, 06:05, Publius <m.publ...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: knucmo <stevejoua...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:328b5b72-3184-4bf5-81c0-e179299d493d@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com: I'd be interested to hear what you think of the concept of class Publius... Pretty broad topic. Can you narrow it down? In relation to the organic fallacy - do you think the idea of '...

On Sep 4, 3:28 pm, Publius <m.publ...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: "Daniel T." <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote innews:daniel_t-9537B4.17201531082008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net: Please let the collective cells of your body know that they are a fallacy. They will love to hear it. A common but invalid comparison. The cells of your body comprise an organism; the members of ...

On 4 Sep, 20:28, Publius <m.publ...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: "Daniel T." <danie...@earthlink.net> wrote innews:daniel_t-9537B4.17201531082008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net: knucmo <stevejoua...@hotmail.... let the collective cells of your body know that they are a fallacy. They will love to hear it. I'd be interested to hear what you think of the concept of class Publius...

Publius wrote: Ed <solon013@earthlink.net> wrote in news:3ae76a04-4e42-4094-ae57-667d957b0af3@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com: Nor does it need to. The most common form is "teaming", identifying with a group that one perceives as persuing a common goal; like a football player identifing with his team or a union member identifying with his union buddies, or a Chamber ...

Publius wrote: "tooly" <rdh11@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:RUOuk.20317$De7.14609@bignews7.bellsouth.net: You hit upon my input here. It seems to me we exist as a dichotomy, where our aggregation is psychological to a great degree, and we act as individuals internally, but as collectives externally. I have for some time argued that we exist with concentric human ...

... so. The relationships persist only as long as those advantages continue; when such relationships cease to be advantageous, the individual can terminate them and form new ones. *Individual humans, after early childhood, are biologically self-sufficient, capable of surviving entirely outside a social context*, just as are most other mammals and birds. Another common, and equally invalid, ...

...> Please let the collective cells of your body know that they are a fallacy. They will love to hear it. Good reply...Thank you. Publius's nonsense is quite stifling at times. He argues as if from a textbook...one the rest of us have not seen. Nonsense to me anyway as it like he is saying the sky is not blue after all, but polka dotted.

Ed <solon013@earthlink.net> wrote in news:3ae76a04-4e42-4094-ae57-667d957b0af3@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com: Nor does it need to. The most common form is "teaming", identifying with a group that one perceives as persuing a common goal; like a football player identifing with his team or a union member identifying with his union buddies, or a Chamber of Commerce member identifying...

"tooly" <rdh11@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:RUOuk.20317$De7.14609@bignews7.bellsouth.net: You hit upon my input here. It seems to me we exist as a dichotomy, where our aggregation is psychological to a great degree, and we act as individuals internally, but as collectives externally. I have for some time argued that we exist with concentric human identity, like circular waves...