...running on and then build a microkernel around it". That's an ...> was the goal of every microkernel (its just many/any didn't...different we would look from a microkernel environment like L4 then. I know...running on and then build a microkernel around it". That'... thatwas the goal of every microkernel (its just many/any didn&#... we would look from a microkernel environment like L4 then.I ...
... well on whatever platform we are running on and then build a microkernel around it". That's an oversimplification, and perhaps at that level of abstraction -- that was the goal of every microkernel (its just many/any didn't succeed at that goal). I'... that -- one wonders how different we would look from a microkernel environment like L4 then. I know the Japanese folks talked about ...
...now, as of a few weeks ago. Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? yep, I could never get them to build on red hat. My mistake, using red hat, but ... ...s "open sourced" now, as of a few weeks ago.> > Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels?> > yep, I could never get them to build on red hat. My mistake, using red hat, but ... long...
....com> wrote: On 10/7/07, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote: It's "open sourced" now, as of a few weeks ago. Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? yep, I could never get them to build on red hat. My mistake, using red hat, but ... long story. ron Yep, it was pretty compiler specific back when I used it on my Power ...
..."open sourced" now, as of a few weeks ago. Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? yep, I could never get them to build on red hat. My mistake, using red hat, but ... long... It's "open sourced" now, as of a few weeks ago.>> Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? yep, I could never get them to build on red hat. My mistake, using redhat, but ... long story.ronYep...
... qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel i've seen described (but i haven't...> Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? Linux is not interesting Lots of noise from...qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel i've seen described>> (but i...:)> Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? Linux is not interestingLots of noise from nowhereL4...
... qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel i've seen described (but i haven't ... Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? Linux is not interesting Lots of noise from...qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel i've seen described>> (but i...:)> Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? Linux is not interestingLots of noise from nowhere...
.../6/07, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote: qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel i've seen described (but i haven't seen their code). It's "open sourced" ...O, the plan is much better. After all, IHateThisNotation() :) Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? Linux is not interesting Lots of noise from nowhere -- www.andr.ru
>> It's "open sourced" now, as of a few weeks ago. Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? yep, I could never get them to build on red hat. My mistake, using red hat, but ... long story. after looking at the code, i didn't try to compile it. the version i looked at was c++ and seemed much more complicated than the claimed handful of system calls. - erik
...> qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel i've seen described (but i haven't ... Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? -- "By cosmic rule, as day yields night, so... qnx is probably the most reasonable so-called microkernel i've seen described> (but i ... ago.Ever looked at the L4 family of microkernels? -- "By cosmic rule, as...
