And here is the same code in unit/module form with tables commented out: The possible table lookups/optimizations are left in in case I or any one else wants to test those ;) // *** Begin of Module Code *** unit UnitStringToUint64_version_003; interface function TryStrToUint64( S : string; var Value : Uint64 ) : boolean; implementation { Skybuck's TryStrToUint64 conversion

Hello, Sometimes I google for my own code and then it sucks if I one can't find it or too it's incomplete. So one more time the complete code as it now is, all 3 versions embedded. Version 0.03 is now active... big 1600 bytes lookup tables still active but those could be commented out. Maybe somebody else could write a nice benchmark program for it ? Tomorrow maybe I write one, but

David Marcus wrote: David Marcus wrote: There is a well-defined mathematical function from real numbers to real numbers that rounds numbers to a given number of digits. There is no reason why a computer can't implement the restriction of this function to the set of binary floating point numbers. My point was that implementing such a function by rescaling is unlikely

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/78113/en-us KL [MVP - Microsoft Excel] "Alexander VY" <AlexanderVY@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:07C09395-CB2D-4B8A-B74B-C28B37BF1C57@microsoft.com... Случайно наткнулся: Пишем: 0,1 0,1 90 100 =A2+A$1 =B2-B$1 Копируем, получаем: 0,1 0,1 90