500000000000000
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 9 articles for 0.302 sec
"Olivier " <m.olivier.lemaire@gmail.com> wrote in message <g684i1$o5l$1@fred.mathworks.com>... > Peter Boettcher <boettcher@ll.mit.edu> wrote in message > <muyprp45poc.fsf@G99-Boettcher.llan.ll.mit.edu>... > > "Olivier " <m.olivier.lemaire@gmail.com> writes: > > I don't try to prove anything, I just try to use a tool I > appreciate. > > Well, I tried the following: > >> format long >     

Group: comp.softsys.matlab · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in comp.softsys.matlab
Author: Bruno Luong
Date: Jul 23, 2008 13:53

"Olivier " <m.olivier.lemaire@gmail.com> writes: Peter Boettcher <boettcher@ll.mit.edu> wrote in message <muyprp45poc.fsf@G99-Boettcher.llan.ll.mit.edu>... format long datadlm = dlmread('sParamToxOrderedDataSet.txt', '\t', 1,0); datadlm datadlm(:,1), datadlm(:,5) ans = 1.0e+10 * 0.100000000000000 0.200000000000000 0.300000000000000 0.400000000000000
Show full article (1.97Kb) · Show article thread
Peter Boettcher <boettcher@ll.mit.edu> wrote in message <muyprp45poc.fsf@G99-Boettcher.llan.ll.mit.edu>... > "Olivier " <m.olivier.lemaire@gmail.com> writes: I don't try to prove anything, I just try to use a tool I appreciate. Well, I tried the following: >> format long >> datadlm = dlmread('sParamToxOrderedDataSet.txt', '\t', 1,0); >> datadlm >> datadlm(:,1), datadlm(:,5) ans     

Group: comp.softsys.matlab · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in comp.softsys.matlab
Author: Peter Boettcher
Date: Jul 23, 2008 13:51

And here is the same code in unit/module form with tables commented out: The possible table lookups/optimizations are left in in case I or any one else wants to test those ;) // *** Begin of Module Code *** unit UnitStringToUint64_version_003; interface function TryStrToUint64( S : string; var Value : Uint64 ) : boolean; implementation { Skybuck's TryStrToUint64 conversion
Show full article (0.84Kb) · Show article thread
And here is the same code in unit/module form with tables commented out: The possible table lookups/optimizations are left in in case I or any one else wants to test those ;) // *** Begin of Module Code *** unit UnitStringToUint64_version_003; interface function TryStrToUint64( S : string; var Value : Uint64 ) : boolean; implementation { Skybuck's TryStrToUint64 conversion     

Group: comp.softsys.matlab · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in comp.softsys.matlab
Author: Olivier
Date: Jul 23, 2008 13:33

Hello, Sometimes I google for my own code and then it sucks if I one can't find it or too it's incomplete. So one more time the complete code as it now is, all 3 versions embedded. Version 0.03 is now active... big 1600 bytes lookup tables still active but those could be commented out. Maybe somebody else could write a nice benchmark program for it ? Tomorrow maybe I write one, but
Show full article (1.07Kb) · Show article thread
Hello, Sometimes I google for my own code and then it sucks if I one can't find it or too it's incomplete. So one more time the complete code as it now is, all 3 versions embedded. Version 0.03 is now active... big 1600 bytes lookup tables still active but those could be commented out. Maybe somebody else could write a nice benchmark program for it ? Tomorrow maybe I write one, but     

Group: alt.lang.asm · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in alt.lang.asm
Author: Skybuck Flying
Date: Oct 25, 2007 01:12

Hello, Here is my version 0.01 and my optimized version 0.02 which uses only one lookup and one addition per character/digit. Also the checks will be pretty fast because it's very unlike the checks will: 1. Happen at all for lesser/smaller values/strings. 2. Happen at full length, full length for maximum value only ;) So pretty fast "safety" checks. And finally 3. Pretty damn
Show full article (9.41Kb)
David Marcus wrote: > David Marcus wrote: > > There is a well-defined mathematical function from real numbers to real > > numbers that rounds numbers to a given number of digits. There is no > > reason why a computer can't implement the restriction of this function > > to the set of binary floating point numbers. My point was that > > implementing such a function by rescaling is unlikely     

Group: alt.comp.lang.borlanddelphi · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in alt.comp.lang.borlanddelphi
Author: Skybuck Flying
Date: Oct 25, 2007 01:12

Show full article (9.41Kb)
    

Group: alt.lang.asm · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in alt.lang.asm
Author: Skybuck Flying
Date: Oct 25, 2007 01:04

Show full article (10.07Kb)
    

Group: alt.comp.lang.borlanddelphi · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in alt.comp.lang.borlanddelphi
Author: Skybuck Flying
Date: Oct 25, 2007 01:04

Show full article (10.07Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.comp.lang.borlanddelphi · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in alt.comp.lang.borlanddelphi
Author: Skybuck Flying
Date: Oct 25, 2007 00:31

Show full article (9.72Kb)
    

Group: borland.public.delphi.nontechnical · Group Profile · Search for 500000000000000 in borland.public.delphi.nontechnical
Author: David Marcus
Date: Aug 13, 2007 11:50

Show full article (1.29Kb) · Show article thread