435033
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 2 articles for 0.303 sec
Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es> wrote: > The GFDL should be moved to "Licenses currently found in Debian main", > with "common", and specifying that only if no invariant sections are > present. The "common" suggestion surprised me. How did the FDL get into common-licenses? It must be included *in* all copies of the covered work even for verbatim copying (see section 2), so cannot be     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for 435033 in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: MJ Ray
Date: Aug 6, 2007 03:50

Package: www.debian.org Hello. http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ says: Work in Progress Manoj Srivastava has drafted a position statement about the FDL which is yet to be voted upon. The GFDL should be moved to "Licenses currently found in Debian main", with "common", and specifying that only if no invariant sections are present. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó
Show full article (0.68Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for 435033 in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Adeodato Simó
Date: Jul 28, 2007 10:40

Show full article (0.62Kb)