...t/06excepts........ok t/07multiconn......ok t/08subclass.......Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/perl5.8.8@33662/lib/site_perl/5.8.8/SQL/Statement/Util.pm line 54, <GEN2375> line 1. Error 2000000000 (SQLSTATE S1000): Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /usr/perl5.8.8@33662/lib/site_perl/5.8.8/SQL/Statement.pm line 1777, <GEN2375> line 1. at main::t/...

... 'make test': /Users/david/cpantesting/perl-5.9.5/bin/perl5.9.5 Build --makefile_env_macros 1 test t/dbh......... # Failed test 'Check err' # at t/dbh.t line 35. # got: '2000000000' # expected: '1' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 28. dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 8 Failed 1/28 tests, 96.43%% okay t/dbi.........ok 12/...

.../home/src/perl/repoperls/installed-perls/perl/pz0geEq/perl-5.8.0@32186/bin/perl Build --makefile_env_macros 1 test t/dbh......... # Failed test 'Check err' # at t/dbh.t line 35. # got: '2000000000' # expected: '1' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 28. dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 8 Failed 1/28 tests, 96.43%% okay t/dbi.........ok...

.../home/src/perl/repoperls/installed-perls/perl/pvwIggk/perl-5.8.0@32174/bin/perl Build --makefile_env_macros 1 test t/dbh......... # Failed test 'Check err' # at t/dbh.t line 35. # got: '2000000000' # expected: '1' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 28. dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 8 Failed 1/28 tests, 96.43%% okay t/dbi.........ok...

.../home/src/perl/repoperls/installed-perls/perl/pdlY86a/perl-5.8.0@32154/bin/perl Build --makefile_env_macros 1 test t/dbh......... # Failed test 'Check err' # at t/dbh.t line 35. # got: '2000000000' # expected: '1' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 28. dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 8 Failed 1/28 tests, 96.43%% okay t/dbi.........ok...

...dal.ca> wrote: I do have a follow-up question: What does the standard say about the minimum range of integers that must be supported? Is it safe (portable) to assume that selected_int_kind(2000000000) [or 2**31 -1 if you prefer] will return a positive value? The standard does not say. And selected_int_kind takes a number of decimal digits as the argument. You could have a ...

....ca> wrote: I do have a follow-up question: What does the standard say about the minimum range of integers that must be supported? Is it safe (portable) to assume that selected_int_kind(2000000000) [or 2**31 -1 if you prefer] will return a positive value? The standard does not say. And selected_int_kind takes a number of decimal digits as the argument. You could have a standard-...

I do have a follow-up question: What does the standard say about the minimum range of integers that must be supported? Is it safe (portable) to assume that selected_int_kind(2000000000) [or 2**31 -1 if you prefer] will return a positive value?

...for good bug-hunting rather than high speed. Sun and g95 were on a Solaris machine, Compaq and NAG on a DEC Alpha with OSTYPE=osf1: g95: g95 -std=f95 -freal=nan -finteger=2000000000 -fbounds-check Sun: f95 -ansi -V -C -w4 -ftrap=%%all,no%%inexact,no%%underflow -g Compaq: f95 -C -check format -check overflow -version -g -std -warn argument_checking NAG: nagf95...

...were intended for good bug-hunting rather than high speed. Sun and g95 were on a Solaris machine, Compaq and NAG on a DEC Alpha with OSTYPE=osf1: g95: g95 -std=f95 -freal=nan -finteger=2000000000 -fbounds-check Sun: f95 -ansi -V -C -w4 -ftrap=%%all,no%%inexact,no%%underflow -g Compaq: f95 -C -check format -check overflow -version -g -std -warn argument_checking NAG: nagf95 -...