... that's trolling. (Perhaps that's another term you don't know the meaning of?) 172 m.p.h. is not a safe speed to travel on any British road. This applies whatever ...to have an accident, or that an accident would have been no more serious, at 172 m.p.h. than whatever the speed limit was must be utterly stupid. I don't recall anyone disagreeing with...

... or dangerous driving; speeding being a specific offense that Brian can't seem to understand. 20 m.p.h. or even 10 can still be speeding, depending on the road conditions. If the speed limit is ...exact words were wrong. Wrong. Fact remains that the guy who did 172 is where he should be and I hope that all of you who ...

...how can that be "speeding"? Its not its careless or dangerous driving; speeding being a specific offense that Brian can't seem to understand. 20 m.p.h. or even 10 can still be speeding, depending on the road conditions. If the speed limit is thirty and a car is being driven at...

... by signs, but by the presence of services immediately prior to it, but even at about 40 m.p.h. I completely missed the exit. Yet through the gloom I could spot the occasional fog light of a car speeding past me at 60 or 70 m.p.h. There wasn't much chance of seeing any signs indicating a speed restriction, but common sense would ...

... by signs, but by the presence of services immediately prior to it, but even at about 40 m.p.h. I completely missed the exit. Yet through the gloom I could spot the occasional fog light of a car speeding past me at 60 or 70 m.p.h. There wasn't much chance of seeing any signs indicating a speed restriction, but common sense would ...

... be liable for prosecution. I have no problem with that. Like most road traffic incidents, that's got nothing to do with speed. 20 m.p.h. or even 10 can still be speeding, depending on the road conditions. If the speed limit is thirty and a car is being driven at ...

... be liable for prosecution. I have no problem with that. Like most road traffic incidents, that's got nothing to do with speed. 20 m.p.h. or even 10 can still be speeding, depending on the road conditions. If the speed limit is thirty and a car is being driven at twenty ...

Brian Robertson (brian@[nospam].com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : Speeding is speeding, whether above or below the limit. <prints, frames> 20 m.p.h. or even 10 can still be speeding, depending on the road conditions. It can be careless. It can be dangerous. It cannot be speeding.

... still be liable for prosecution. I have no problem with that. Like most road traffic incidents, that's got nothing to do with speed. 20 m.p.h. or even 10 can still be speeding, depending on the road conditions. If the speed limit is thirty and a car is being driven at twenty in ...

Brian Robertson (brian@[nospam].com) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : Fact remains that the guy who did 172 is where he should be Perhaps. But he's not there because of "speeding" - he doesn't appear to even have gained a single point on his licence for an SPxx offence.