134 3428
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 11 articles for 0.310 sec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Post-Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 22:51:00 +0000 SPAMCOP.net-REPORT: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2047226728z4ebab496c89281594948715cc8ced5b8z Spam-Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 21:09:18 +0000 (1215298260) Info: Copy of spam reported via SpamCop.Net Info: Country info based on zz.countries.nerd.dk Info: ASN info based on asn.routeviews.org Spam-Track: IP     

Group: news.admin.netabuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in news.admin.netabuse.sightings
Author: Andrzej Filip
Date: Jul 5, 2008 15:51

The following patches fix some race conditions in rename(). (They do not fix *all* the races. That will require a complete rewrite. This patch is meant for pullup to release branches, which will be painful enough as it is.) The introduction of a per-fs rename lock is necessary to make the parent check atomic with the lookups, and is not a hack. The new relookup() is a hack. I have not made
Show full article (3.51Kb)
The following patches fix some race conditions in rename(). (They do not fix *all* the races. That will require a complete rewrite. This patch is meant for pullup to release branches, which will be painful enough as it is.) The introduction of a per-fs rename lock is necessary to make the parent check atomic with the lookups, and is not a hack. The new relookup() is a hack. I have not made     

Group: fa.netbsd.tech.kern · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in fa.netbsd.tech.kern
Author: David Holland
Date: Jan 13, 2008 09:33

This is guaranteed spam from unconfirmed opt-in mailing lists for spurious addresses at poopypants.com or other vanity domains. hormboy@fw.merk.com is a USENET spamtrap seed. ---------------------- From editors@byteandswitch.com Fri Oct 26 13:16:43 2007 Received: from mx0.public.com (mx0.public.com [66.112.160.20]) by public.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l9QHGhh6024784 for <x@public
Show full article (29.75Kb)
> Sorry, yes. Nothing else contended for it though, so it doesn't > appear to be a source of performance problems - it is probably a > secondary effect from something else. I guess you're running some old > version of FreeBSD since those line numbers don't correspond to > anything reasonable in the current 6.x source, so I dunno what > exactly. FreeBSD 6.0 > > > The rest looks fine at     

Group: muc.lists.netbsd.tech.kern · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in muc.lists.netbsd.tech.kern
Author: David Holland
Date: Jan 13, 2008 09:32

Looks to me like your machine's a zombie. If so, your ISP should be able to glance at his logs and tell you for certain. If that's not something you're running on purpose, you have a lot more problems than just port 25. Time to get some gurus into the act or backup and install from scratch. If you're caught by your ISP/hoster/s without having told them about the problems, you'll get
Show full article (29.89Kb)
Report from TCPView below explorer.exe:73440 TCP demo.thegaregroup.local:2144 207.58.161.46:smtp ESTABLISHED explorer.exe:73440 TCP demo.thegaregroup.local:2173 209.240.204.26:smtp ESTABLISHED explorer.exe:73440 TCP demo.thegaregroup.local:2292 195.210.169.134:smtp ESTABLISHED explorer.exe:73440 TCP demo.thegaregroup.local:2302 207.111.237.11:smtp ESTABLISHED explorer.exe:73440 TCP demo     

Group: news.admin.netabuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in news.admin.netabuse.sightings
Author: USENET n.a.n-a.s reports
Date: Oct 26, 2007 10:30

ok guys, downloaded TCPView and process is explorer.exe:1788 or what ever it changes to when I end the process have run all worm detections tools available but to no avail still these connections keep appearing. Have the latest Symantec corporate edition AV. Any ideas? Regards Simon "Andrei Ungureanu [MVP]" <contact me via www.itboard.ro> wrote in message news:eBc3IaNDHHA.3396@TK2MSFTNGP02
Show full article (4.35Kb)
Hi all, below is a report of active NAT sessions from my router, doesnt matter what i try to do wont disconnect any of these connections to my local machine 192.168.1.25. Any suggestions? Regards Simon ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Private IP :Port #Pseudo Port Peer IP :Port Ifno Status ----------------------------     

Group: lucky.freebsd.questions · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in lucky.freebsd.questions
Author: Dieter
Date: Dec 14, 2006 06:37

here's my results. ; start 2006-10-05T21:31:39-07:00 ; end 2006-10-11T06:52:03-07:00 ; http://xahlee.org/emacs/command-frequency.el 28723 self-insert-command 9578 next-line 7431 previous-line 4402 backward-word 3428 forward-word 2544 kill-region 2394 isearch-printing-char 1820 forward-char 1669 delete-backward-char 1426 backward-char 1169 save-buffer 905 newline 751 yank 701 backward
Show full article (15.92Kb)
    

Group: microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
Author: Pop`
Date: Nov 22, 2006 17:51

Show full article (14.05Kb)
    

Group: microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
Author: Simon Gare
Date: Nov 22, 2006 17:06

Show full article (13.47Kb)
    

Group: microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
Author: Simon Gare
Date: Nov 22, 2006 16:45

Show full article (10.98Kb)
    

Group: microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in microsoft.public.windows.networking.firewall
Author: Simon Gare
Date: Nov 16, 2006 03:44

Show full article (8.94Kb)
    

Group: comp.emacs.xemacs · Group Profile · Search for 134 3428 in comp.emacs.xemacs
Author: Xah Lee
Date: Oct 11, 2006 06:55

Show full article (6.50Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next