10000000000000000000000000000000
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 15 articles for 0.303 sec
>> Let's put your claim to the test, here's a value for you: >> >> 10000000000000000000000000000000 (binary) >> 80000000 (same value in hex) > > Use windows fucking calculator you dumbass: > > It's: 2147483648 > > Which will fit perfectly in an unsigned 32 bit integer. > >> Let's say we got a signed 32 bit integer above. What is the value in >> base 10? Can you please tell me what you *think*     

Group: alt.lang.asm · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in alt.lang.asm
Author: x87asm
Date: Jul 6, 2007 15:17

<jukka@liimatta.org> wrote in message news:1183758463.127045.276580@g13g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... On Jul 7, 12:21 am, "Skybuck Flying" <s...@hotmail.com> wrote: <j...@liimatta.org> wrote in message news:1183756657.917793.9520@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com... On Jul 6, 9:33 pm, "Skybuck Flying" <s...@hotmail.com> wrote: Man get a clue. Two's complement fits
Show full article (0.60Kb) · Show article thread
<jukka@liimatta.org> wrote in message news:1183758463.127045.276580@g13g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 7, 12:21 am, "Skybuck Flying" <s...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> <j...@liimatta.org> wrote in message >> >> news:1183756657.917793.9520@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com... >> >> > On Jul 6, 9:33 pm, "Skybuck Flying" <s...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Man get a clue. >> >> >> Two's complement     

Group: alt.lang.asm · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in alt.lang.asm
Author: x87asm
Date: Jul 6, 2007 15:15

On Jul 7, 12:21 am, "Skybuck Flying" <s...@hotmail.com> wrote: <j...@liimatta.org> wrote in message news:1183756657.917793.9520@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com... On Jul 6, 9:33 pm, "Skybuck Flying" <s...@hotmail.com> wrote: Man get a clue. Two's complement fits just fine. It's all a matter of interpretation ! It doesn't fit; that's *precisely* what it _is_
Show full article (1.14Kb) · Show article thread
When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein’s Sep.1905 derivation. It is not consistent prediction from Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation. (written in response to comments) How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is correct equation? In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely. ””””Eq.(13) is based of Einstein’s     

Group: alt.lang.asm · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in alt.lang.asm
Author: Skybuck Flying
Date: Jul 6, 2007 15:07

When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein’s Sep.1905 derivation. It is not consistent prediction from Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation. (written in response to comments) How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is correct equation? In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely. ””””Eq.(13) is based of Einstein’s
Show full article (1.25Kb) · Show article thread
When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein’s Sep.1905 derivation. It is not consistent prediction from Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation. (written in response to comments) How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is correct equation? In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely. ””””Eq.(13) is based of Einstein’s     

Group: alt.lang.asm · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in alt.lang.asm
Author: jukka
Date: Jul 6, 2007 14:47

When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein’s Sep.1905 derivation. It is not consistent prediction from Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation. (written in response to comments) How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is correct equation? In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely. ””””Eq.(13) is based of Einstein’s
Show full article (0.85Kb) · Show article thread
When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein’s Sep.1905 derivation. It is not consistent prediction from Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation. (written in response to comments) How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is correct equation? In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely. ””””Eq.(13) is based of Einstein’s     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in sci.physics.relativity
Author: AJAY SHARMA
Date: Sep 27, 2006 19:09

When light energy is emitted, Mass increases,: Einstein’s Sep.1905 derivation. It is not consistent prediction from Einstein’s Sep 1905 derivation. (written in response to comments) How eq.(13) at page 201 in my paper I incorrect ? Then what is correct equation? In fact Eq.(13) in paper at page 201 is correct absolutely. ””””Eq.(13) is based of Einstein’s
Show full article (14.09Kb)
    

Group: soc.culture.arabic · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in soc.culture.arabic
Author: AJAY SHARMA
Date: Sep 27, 2006 07:55

Show full article (10.68Kb)
    

Group: alt.war.nuclear · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in alt.war.nuclear
Author: AJAY SHARMA
Date: Sep 27, 2006 07:54

Show full article (10.68Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in sci.physics.particle
Author: AJAY SHARMA
Date: Sep 27, 2006 07:45

Show full article (10.68Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.accelerators · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in sci.physics.accelerators
Author: AJAY SHARMA
Date: Sep 27, 2006 07:43

Show full article (10.68Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for 10000000000000000000000000000000 in sci.physics
Author: AJAY SHARMA
Date: Sep 27, 2006 07:41

Show full article (10.68Kb)
1 · 2 · next