|
|
 |
| found 794 articles for 0.329 sec |
  |
|
Group: news.admin.netabuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for 012 111 in news.admin.netabuse.sightings
Author: Andrzej Filip
Date: Sep 24, 2007 09:32
=ybegin line=128 size=29911 name=d_0609.jpg ))=J*:tpsp*+++*r*r**)*m*/-=n=n=n-/=n=n=n///0162111195536;9<<;9;;=}@FA=}>D?;;BKBDGGIII=}ALNLHNFHIH)*m+///1018228H>;>HHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH)ê*;2,_+ì-+L*,;+-;+)î*F**,-++++*********,-*+=n/012)î*l:*+=n+-,/,=n=n/-,//++*,-;K=n<[k{/=} L«»0>\ËMl|Û1ëû ?]N}m¼@O^~¬)î*D+*-++++***********+,-=n/0)î*R;*,,,,,,,-*-+*****+,;-K<[
|
| Show full article (4.49Kb) |
|
=ybegin line=128 size=22802 name=beer_00110.jpg
))=J*:tpsp*++**+*+**)*m*20010/211133246>76556C<=}9>GDIHGDFFJNXQJLVMFFRaSVZ[^^^IQcgb\fX]^\)*m+333656B77B\KFK\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\)ê*;2+Ó,ª-+L*,;+-;+)î*F**,-++++*********+,*-=n/012)î*s:*+=n*=n-/=n1//00-+*+*,-;=n<K[/k{0=}L\«»
Ë>l|Ûëû ?M}1]m¼Ì@N^n~¬½ìoÜü)î*C+++++++***********+,-=n/)î*N;++*,,,,-++++*****+,;-K |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: news.admin.netabuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for 012 111 in news.admin.netabuse.sightings
Author: Andrzej Filip
Date: Sep 21, 2007 12:30
There must be a difference in the data you have versus what I copied from your post. In my testing all duplicates were flagged as such. If you find and correct the data anomaly, try this modified formula: AJ1: =SUMPRODUCT(($AG$1:$AG1=$AG1)*($AH$1:$AH1=AH1)*($AI$1:$AI1=AI1)) When copied down, the formula returns "OK" for the first occurrence of a pattern and "DUPE" for all duplicates
|
| Show full article (3.43Kb) |
|
|
|
1 ·
2 ·
3 ·
4 ·
5 ·
6 ·
7 ·
8 ·
9 ·
next |
|
|
