0 1 Raid Recovery
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 566 articles for 1.868 sec
"RAIDwoes" <sbraudrick@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1181573788.308477.38620@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > I'm hoping someone will see this and set my mind at ease. > > I have a Dell PE 2600 with 6 73GB 15k SCSI drives on a PERC 4/Di > controller arranged as follows: > > Physical Disks: > Disks 0 & 1 = RAID 1 (OS partition, Server2003) > Disks 2 & 3 = RAID 0 (Array 1) > Disks 4 &     

Group: alt.sys.pcclone.dell · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in alt.sys.pcclone.dell
Author: Fixer
Date: Jun 12, 2007 01:59

"RAIDwoes" <sbraudrick@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1181573788.308477.38620@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... I'm hoping someone will see this and set my mind at ease. I have a Dell PE 2600 with 6 73GB 15k SCSI drives on a PERC 4/Di controller arranged as follows: Physical Disks: Disks 0 & 1 = RAID 1 (OS partition, Server2003) Disks 2 & 3 = RAID 0 (Array 1) Disks 4 &
Show full article (2.42Kb) · Show article thread
I'm hoping someone will see this and set my mind at ease. I have a Dell PE 2600 with 6 73GB 15k SCSI drives on a PERC 4/Di controller arranged as follows: Physical Disks: Disks 0 & 1 = RAID 1 (OS partition, Server2003) Disks 2 & 3 = RAID 0 (Array 1) Disks 4 & 5 = RAID 0 (Array 2) Logical Drives: 0 = OS partition 1 = RAID 1 (Array1 & Array 2) Here's what happened and the issue I am     

Group: alt.sys.pcclone.dell · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in alt.sys.pcclone.dell
Author: S.Lewis
Date: Jun 11, 2007 08:30

Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 Version: 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.4 Severity: normal After installing this package & reboot I still used the previous kernel. The vmlinuz links were correct, and after doing a manual 'lilo' & reboot the 2.6.24 kernel booted up. My assumption is that the package installation does not do a 'lilo' by itself. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux
Show full article (2.30Kb) · Show article thread
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 Version: 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.4 Severity: normal After installing this package & reboot I still used the previous kernel. The vmlinuz links were correct, and after doing a manual 'lilo' & reboot the 2.6.24 kernel booted up. My assumption is that the package installation does not do a 'lilo' by itself. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux     

Group: alt.sys.pcclone.dell · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in alt.sys.pcclone.dell
Author: RAIDwoes
Date: Jun 11, 2007 07:56

retitle 495580 Kernel doesn't start a resync after adding a disk. thanks Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2008, 20:28 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft: I don't follow you, sorry. If you want, you can try to restate your case in German. Thank you very much. You got me now on the right track. Sorry for the confusion, I really have to work on this. I wanted to report a bug with the 2.6.27-rc3 kernel
Show full article (1.84Kb)
Currently I'm unable to reproduce this previous reproducable bug. As soon as it problem re-appears I will re-test and let know my findings. Thanks Arno Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Arno van Amersfoort said: > >> Package: hdparm >> Version: 8.9-1 >> >> I'm running a system with several soft RAID1 & RAID6 devices. I >> experienced a problem where the resync/rebuild     

Group: linux.debian.kernel · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in linux.debian.kernel
Author: Geert-Jan Hut
Date: Aug 24, 2008 10:50

This one time, at band camp, Arno van Amersfoort said: Package: hdparm Version: 8.9-1 I'm running a system with several soft RAID1 & RAID6 devices. I experienced a problem where the resync/rebuild of my new array's stalled at 0K/s speed like this: md3 : active raid1 sdb6[2](F) sda6[0] 126953536 blocks [2/1] [U_] [>....................] recovery = 0.0%%
Show full article (24.75Kb)
Package: hdparm Version: 8.9-1 I'm running a system with several soft RAID1 & RAID6 devices. I experienced a problem where the resync/rebuild of my new array's stalled at 0K/s speed like this: md3 : active raid1 sdb6[2](F) sda6[0] 126953536 blocks [2/1] [U_] [>....................] recovery = 0.0%% (103296/126953536) finish=634251.2min speed=0K/sec md4 : active raid6     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Geert-Jan Hut
Date: Aug 24, 2008 10:50

Jürgen Witt schrieb am 08.08.2008 11:46: fdisk -ul /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 19457 cylinders Units = sectors of 1 * 512 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 63 48194 24066 83 Linux /dev/sda2 48195 321299 136552+ 82 Linux swap /dev/sda3 321300 312576704 156127702+ 83
Show full article (24.75Kb)
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Felix Zielcke
Date: Aug 20, 2008 00:50

Show full article (5.42Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Arno van Amersfoort
Date: Aug 13, 2008 06:50

Show full article (5.23Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Stephen Gran
Date: Aug 11, 2008 11:10

Show full article (2.45Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Arno van Amersfoort
Date: Aug 11, 2008 08:00

Show full article (1.56Kb)
    

Group: spline.eisfair · Group Profile · Search for 0 1 Raid Recovery in spline.eisfair
Author: Manfred N. Reiland
Date: Aug 9, 2008 03:51

Show full article (13.71Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next