genre: folk
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 2569 articles for 0.440 sec
Package: audacious Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: wishlist Audacious should support multiple genre/artist tags. This is 'encouraged' by Ogg Vorbis: http://xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html: Field names are not required to be unique (occur once) within a comment header. As an example, assume a track was recorded by three well know[n] artists; the following is permissible, and encouraged     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Erich Schubert
Date: Nov 21, 2007 07:50

On Sep 22, 9:11 am, JohnB <johnbo...@tinyworld.co.uk> wrote: Just an idea - see where it leads... The music industry these days is full of genres as if everything has to be categorised, though this inevitably seems to create argument. However, leaving that aside, we each have an idea of what each genre label covers, more or less, except in some sub-classification levels of music
Show full article (3.12Kb)
On Sep 22, 11:00 am, modern <s...@location.org> wrote: > Harry wrote: > > On Sep 22, 10:43 am, modern <s...@location.org> wrote: > >> JohnB wrote: > >>> Just an idea - see where it leads... > >>> The music industry these days is full of genres as if everything has > >>> to be categorised, though this inevitably seems to create argument. > >>> However, leaving that aside, we each have an idea     

Group: rec.music.beatles · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in rec.music.beatles
Author: M C hammered
Date: Sep 22, 2008 14:14

Harry wrote: On Sep 22, 10:43 am, modern <s...@location.org> wrote: JohnB wrote: Just an idea - see where it leads... The music industry these days is full of genres as if everything has to be categorised, though this inevitably seems to create argument. However, leaving that aside, we each have an idea of what each genre label covers, more or less, except in some sub
Show full article (2.01Kb) · Show article thread
On Sep 22, 10:43 am, modern <s...@location.org> wrote: > JohnB wrote: > > Just an idea - see where it leads... > > > The music industry these days is full of genres as if everything has > > to be categorised, though this inevitably seems to create argument. > > However, leaving that aside, we each have an idea of what each genre > > label covers, more or less, except in some sub-classification     

Group: rec.music.beatles · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in rec.music.beatles
Author: Harry
Date: Sep 22, 2008 12:54

JohnB wrote: Just an idea - see where it leads... The music industry these days is full of genres as if everything has to be categorised, though this inevitably seems to create argument. However, leaving that aside, we each have an idea of what each genre label covers, more or less, except in some sub-classification levels of music we're not really into. I consider myself
Show full article (2.02Kb) · Show article thread
On Sep 22, 9:11 am, JohnB <johnbo...@tinyworld.co.uk> wrote: > Just an idea - see where it leads... > > The music industry these days is full of genres as if everything has > to be categorised, though this inevitably seems to create argument. > However, leaving that aside, we each have an idea of what each genre > label covers, more or less, except in some sub-classification levels > of music     

Group: rec.music.beatles · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in rec.music.beatles
Author: modern
Date: Sep 22, 2008 09:00

Just an idea - see where it leads... The music industry these days is full of genres as if everything has to be categorised, though this inevitably seems to create argument. However, leaving that aside, we each have an idea of what each genre label covers, more or less, except in some sub-classification levels of music we're not really into. I consider myself quite eclectic in what I like
Show full article (1.82Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:16:52 -0700, pbowles@aol.com wrote these lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations: > On 9 Aug, 15:49, Ignis Fatuus <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:11:17 GMT, The Demon of Mockery & Silliness >> >> >> >> >> >> <lola.stonewall.riot.popesna...@meow.empire> wrote: >> >Hail Eris! On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13     

Group: rec.music.beatles · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in rec.music.beatles
Author: Harry
Date: Sep 22, 2008 08:59

On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:16:52 -0700, pbowles@aol.com wrote these lies, denials, arrogant assertions, erroneous presuppositions, and/or obfuscations: On 9 Aug, 15:49, Ignis Fatuus <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote: On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:11:17 GMT, The Demon of Mockery & Silliness <lola.stonewall.riot.popesna...@meow.empire> wrote: Hail Eris! On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13
Show full article (1.66Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.music.beatles · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in rec.music.beatles
Author: modern
Date: Sep 22, 2008 08:43

Show full article (1.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.music.beatles · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in rec.music.beatles
Author: Yesterday
Date: Sep 22, 2008 07:27

Show full article (2.23Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.music.beatles · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in rec.music.beatles
Author: JohnB
Date: Sep 22, 2008 06:11

Show full article (1.33Kb)
    

Group: alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Author: Snarky
Date: Aug 9, 2008 23:43

Show full article (4.45Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.karlmalden.nose · Group Profile · Search for genre: folk in alt.fan.karlmalden.nose
Author: Snarky
Date: Aug 9, 2008 23:43

Show full article (4.45Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next