author: b
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 133015 articles for 1.299 sec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, > Well, I think that dch should recognize that "Author A" has already a > "part" of the changelog entry, and prompt right under it, like: > > [ Author A ] > * changed here > * changed there > * <cursor prompt> > > [ Author B] > * simple change somewhere > > [ Author C] > * just typo fix While this is also the     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for author: b in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Bernd Zeimetz
Date: May 17, 2008 18:30

Package: devscripts Version: 2.10.27 Severity: normal Hello, let's consider a package maintained by a team in a common repository; changes are done by the team members and the interleaves with each other, so the changelog is something like: [ Author A ] * changed here * changed there [ Author B] * simple change somewhere [ Author C] * just typo fix Now, let's consider
Show full article (1.20Kb) · Show article thread
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:06:21 -0500, Bill Snyder <bsnyder@airmail.net> wrote: >Now that brings up some really tricky questions. Must the fame >*derive* from the SF writing; or if Gentry Lee won the lottery, >knocked up Britney Spears, and assassinated George W Bush, would >he become the hands-down winner? If the former, must the work be >*identified* as SF? If so, must it be so identified     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for author: b in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Sandro Tosi
Date: May 17, 2008 17:00

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:16:35 GMT, winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing) wrote: In article <ddfr-320ABC.11392919032008@sfo.news.speakeasy.net>, David Friedman <ddfr@daviddfriedman.nopsam.com> writes: In article <edccdd3f-8d47-4744-8a29-451703b7cbf8@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, Will in New Haven <bill.reich@taylorandfrancis.com> wrote: On Mar
Show full article (5.27Kb)
On 5/11/2011 5:18 PM, Ken S. Tucker wrote: > On May 11, 12:53 pm, Dean Markley<damark...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 11, 2:32 pm, "Ken S. Tucker"<dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On May 11, 7:26 am, Jeff Crowell<jeff.crowellSPAM...@hp.com> wrote: >> >>>> Daryl wrote: >>>>>> Service ceiling: 63,400 ft >> >>>> Ken S. Tucker wrote: >> >>>>> That's at cruise speed, not Mach     

Group: soc.motss · Group Profile · Search for author: b in soc.motss
Author: Howard Brazee
Date: Mar 21, 2008 04:49

On May 11, 12:53 pm, Dean Markley <damark...@gmail.com> wrote: On May 11, 2:32 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote: On May 11, 7:26 am, Jeff Crowell <jeff.crowellSPAM...@hp.com> wrote: Daryl wrote: Service ceiling: 63,400 ft Ken S. Tucker wrote: That's at cruise speed, not Mach 2. The sustainable altitude of the B-58
Show full article (0.65Kb) · Show article thread
On May 11, 12:32 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote: > On May 11, 7:26 am, Jeff Crowell <jeff.crowellSPAM...@hp.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Daryl wrote: > > >> Service ceiling: 63,400 ft > > >   Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > > > That's at cruise speed, not Mach 2. The sustainable altitude of the > > > B-58 at M2 is 80K', The faster it goes the higher it can fly. > > > The devil     

Group: soc.motss · Group Profile · Search for author: b in soc.motss
Author: Bill Snyder
Date: Mar 19, 2008 20:06

On 5/11/2011 2:38 AM, Ken S. Tucker wrote: On May 10, 3:42 pm, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote: On 5/10/2011 3:59 PM, Ken S. Tucker wrote: On May 10, 2:29 pm, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west2.com> wrote: On 5/10/2011 2:19 PM, Ken S. Tucker wrote: On May 10, 1:08 pm, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west2.com> wrote: On 5/10/2011 1:28 PM, Ken S. Tucker wrote
Show full article (2.52Kb) · Show article thread
On May 11, 2:32 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote: > On May 11, 7:26 am, Jeff Crowell <jeff.crowellSPAM...@hp.com> wrote: > > > > > Daryl wrote: > > >> Service ceiling: 63,400 ft > > >   Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > > > That's at cruise speed, not Mach 2. The sustainable altitude of the > > > B-58 at M2 is 80K', The faster it goes the higher it can fly. > > > The devil is in     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for author: b in rec.aviation.military
Author: Daryl
Date: May 11, 2011 17:13

On May 11, 7:26 am, Jeff Crowell <jeff.crowellSPAM...@hp.com> wrote: Daryl wrote: Service ceiling: 63,400 ft Ken S. Tucker wrote: That's at cruise speed, not Mach 2. The sustainable altitude of the B-58 at M2 is 80K', The faster it goes the higher it can fly. The devil is in the detials. That last sentence is a perfect precis of your posts in general, Ken
Show full article (3.53Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for author: b in rec.aviation.military
Author: Ken S. Tucker
Date: May 11, 2011 16:18

Show full article (2.56Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for author: b in rec.aviation.military
Author: Schiffner
Date: May 11, 2011 15:43

Show full article (1.97Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for author: b in rec.aviation.military
Author: Daryl
Date: May 11, 2011 14:36

Show full article (7.42Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for author: b in rec.aviation.military
Author: Dean Markley
Date: May 11, 2011 12:53

Show full article (1.82Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for author: b in rec.aviation.military
Author: Ken S. Tucker
Date: May 11, 2011 11:32

Show full article (1.60Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next