|
|
 |
| found 20 articles for 0.256 sec |
  |
|
| On 27 mai, 18:52, MBDunc <micha...@mail.suomi.net> wrote:
> On 27 touko, 19:02, "Vari L. Cinicke" <variesn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 5/27/2010 11:58 AM, Manuel aka Xax wrote:
>
> > > On 27 mai, 15:23, "Vari L. Cinicke"<variesn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On 5/27/2010 8:55 AM, Manuel aka Xax wrote:
>
> > >>> On 26 mai, 15:10, "Raja, The Great"<zepflo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: rec.sport.tennis · Group Profile · Search for *other basterd in rec.sport.tennis
Author: Shakes
Date: Jun 7, 2010 12:12
On 5/31/2010 10:50 PM, arnab.z@gmail wrote: On May 31, 6:25 pm, Inglourious Basterd Fed does indeed have 5 more slams than Laver, however let's not forget Laver has 2 CYGS (Fed has none), and Laver missed 5 years of potential slam winning when he was equally dominant on the pro circuit. Once again your thinking is too black and white, and ignores the nuances of the situation
|
| Show full article (0.53Kb) · Show article thread |
Group: rec.sport.tennis · Group Profile · Search for *other basterd in rec.sport.tennis
Author: Manuel aka Xax
Date: Jun 1, 2010 02:21
On Thu, 13 May 2010 10:53:26 -0700 (PDT), Fikkie <pascal.beyens@gmail.com> wrote: On 13 mei, 19:29, Luc.vd <Luc...@no-spam-telenet.be> wrote: On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:49:30 -0700 (PDT), Fikkie <pascal.bey...@gmail.com> wrote: On 13 mei, 18:39, <<+:-p)))))> <:-[@[.be> wrote: Het is zò dat Fikkie formuleerde : On 13 mei, 18:31, <<+:-p)))))> <:-[@[.be> wrote
|
| Show full article (3.42Kb) |
|
|
|
1 ·
2 ·
next |
|
|
